Hello Guys, Welcome to Hosting Lovers!
If you are planning to buy Scalahosting shared hosting, and you want to know the performance of Scalahosting shared hosting, then you are in the right place. In this blog post, We will test the speed and performance of Scalahosting shared hosting with 10+ different and extensive tests.
Let’s Get Started!
Scalahosting shared Hosting
Sclahosting was started in 2007. Currently, Scalahosting has hosted 7,00,000+ websites and gained 50,000+ customers. Scalahosting is known beacuse of it’s affordable pricing and expert and fast support. Scalahosting provides Shared hosting and Cloud hosting.
In this post, we will talk about shared plans of Scalahosting.
Plans & Pricing
Scalahosting offers three different shared plans. Mini, Start, and Advanced. I think Start plan is the most value for money plan here. You can host unlimited websites in the Start plan. The mini plan is not a good value because you can host only one website for 4$ per month.
If you are thinking to buy the advanced plan, then you should get the ScalaHosting Cloud VPS Start plan. You can read more about ScalaHosting Cloud VPS here.
Testing Environment
To test ScalaHosting shared hosting speed and performance, I bought a plan. If you are a regular reader of this blog, you will already know that I create the same testing website when I perform speed tests. After buying the plan, I installed WordPress and connected it with my domain which I bought from NameCheap.
I do not want to run tests on a blank website, so I installed Blocksy Theme and one of its demo websites called ‘Tasty.’ I have to install four additional extra plugins with the demo website: Blocksy Companion, WP Forms Lite, Stackable, Recipe Card Blocks by WPZOOM.
Hosting: ScalaHosting Shared
Plan: Start
Server Location: Dallas
WordPress Version: 5.8
Themes: Blocksy (Active), Twenty twenty One
Plugins: Blocksy Companion, WP Forms Lite, Stackable, Recipe Card Blocks by WPZOOM
After setting this testing environment, I did not perform any extra optimizations like caching, Image compressing, modification, or any other kind of speed improvement. It would be best if you always did these optimizations to improve your website, but I wanted to know the actual performance of Scalahosting shared hosting without any optimizations.
Quick Disclaimer:
I want to inform you guys that all the results are honest and authentic in this blog post. To do these kinds of tests, I have to spend a lot of money from my pocket and time, So I would like to request that if you want to buy Scalahosting or any other hosting, please use our affiliate links. You will get an extra discount, and this website will earn a small amount of commission from it. So, we can do more feature speed tests, reviews, and comparisons without any sponsors.
Now, without wasting your precious time, let’s start testing.
TTFB Test
TTFB stands for time to first byte. To put it simply, this is a measurement of how long the browser has to wait before receiving its first byte of data from the server. The longer it takes to get that data, the longer it takes to display your page.
TTFB depends on the Hosting server, Themes, and plugins. But most of the part is played by the hosting server. If hosting using a high-performance server, you will get low TTFB, and if hosting uses a standard specifications server, it will be high.
Most of the hostings stores your website files in a single location. From that server, the hosting will send all the files to the visitors. If your hosting server is located in the USA, your website will get very low TTFB in the USA, Canada, and European countries. But it will be much higher in Asia and Australia.
Therefore when you buy hosting from any of the providers, try to choose the nearest server location from your website’s audience. (not closest to you but closest to your website users)
When visitors come to your website, the browser will send all the requests and ask for the required files to the hosting server. After that, hosting will send an initial reply to the browser. Now, the time between browser requests and hosting initial response will be called TTFB.
Your website will load fast if your hosting TTFB is low. Means, as low is the TTFB of your website, visitor have to wait for less. By this, the bounce rate of your website can decrease drastically.
TTFB can be different from location to location and time to time. Therefore, we will do multiple tests from multiple worldwide locations. So, we can get the best accurate value. In the TTFB test, we will use three different tools and will take five different results.
KeyCDN TTFB Test
TTFB test one is done from KeyCDN Tools. This tool will measure the TTFB from 10 different worldwide locations. I have taken three different results of this test from different other days.
| Server Location | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frankfurt | 663 ms | 643 ms | 661 ms |
| Amsterdam | 628 ms | 592 ms | 626 ms |
| London | 557 ms | 577 ms | 647 ms |
| New York | 372 ms | 385 ms | 398 ms |
| Dallas | 478 ms | 526 ms | 494 ms |
| San Francisco | 596 ms | 595 ms | 590 ms |
| Singapore | 1.11 s | 1.07 s | 1.08 s |
| Sydney | 1.1 s | 1.02 s | 995 ms |
| Tokyo | 918 ms | 936 ms | 912 ms |
| Bangalore | 1.04 s | 1.01 s | 1.04 s |
| Global Average | 746 ms | 735 ms | 744 ms |
GT Metrix TTFB Test
TTFB test two is done from GTMetrix. I have done seven different tests to measure the TTFB from seven different locations.
| Server Location | TTFB |
|---|---|
| Vancouver, Canada | 1.0 s |
| Hong Kong, China | 1.8 s |
| London, UK | 979 ms |
| Mumbai, India | 1.2 s |
| San Antonio, TX, USA | 921 ms |
| Sydney, Australia | 1.4 s |
| São Paulo, Brazil | 1.4 s |
| Global Average | 1.2 s |
Fast or Slow TTFB Test
TTFB test three is done from Fast or Slow. Fast or Slow will measure the website TTFB and Speed from 18 worldwide locations. This is the heaviest test from all of the tests.
Here is the end of the TTFB tests, now we will start the Speed Test.
Speed Test
We will measure the website’s fully loaded time and some core web vitals in the Speed test. The website’s fully loaded time and core web vitals can depend on Hosting servers, Themes, Plugins, and testing page content. But, as I told you before, We used the same testing environment to avoid the Theme, Plugins, and testing page content.
Google PageSpeed
If you want to rank higher in Google search, you should strictly follow the Google Core web vitals. You can measure these parameters from the Google PageSpeed Insights tool, which is the official testing tool of Google.
Therefore, we will do our first speed test in Google PageSpeed Insights. Speed Index and Time to Interactive are parameters we should follow. Google PageSpeed Insights results are not consistent. Therefore, I will conduct three different tests on separate days to get the most accurate results.
Mobile
| Metrics | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 65 | 61 | 67 | 64 |
| Time to Interactive | 8.0 s | 8.4 s | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
| Speed Index | 7.9 s | 7.5 s | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
Desktop
| Metrics | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 89 | 92 | 88 | 89 |
| Time to Interactive | 1.6 s | 0.9 s | 1.3 s | 1.2 s |
| Speed Index | 2.4 s | 2.6 s | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
Pingdom Test
The second speed test is done with Pingdom from seven different worldwide locations. Load time is the factor that we will consider in this test.
| Server Location | Load Time |
|---|---|
| Tokyo – Japan | 3.74 s |
| Frankfurt – Germany | 2.16 s |
| London – UK | 2.03 s |
| Washington D.C. – USA | 1.48 s |
| San Francisco – USA | 1.98 s |
| Sydney – Australia | 4.11 s |
| Ṣo Paulo РBrazil | 2.73 s |
| Global Average | 2.60 s |
GTMetrix Test
The third speed test is done with the GTMetrix tool from seven different worldwide locations. GTMetrix is based on Google PageSpeed Insights. You should look up to Fully Loaded time. I have taken seven different tests from all of the seven locations of GTMetrix. At last, you will see the global average results.
| Server Location | Performance | Speed Index | Fully Loaded Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver, Canada | 79% | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
| Hong Kong, China | 41% | 3.7 s | 5.5 s |
| London, UK | 79% | 1.8 s | 2.4 s |
| Mumbai, India | 63% | 2.5 s | 3.7 s |
| San Antonio, TX, USA | 84% | 1.5 s | 2.2 s |
| Sydney, Australia | 56% | 2.9 s | 4.2 s |
| São Paulo, Brazil | 53% | 3.1 s | 4.1 s |
| Global Average | 65% | 2.4 s | 3.5 s |
KeyCDN Speed Test
The fourth speed test is done with KeyCDN Tools. There are ten different worldwide locations in the KeyCDN Testing tool. We can measure the website load time, page size, requests, and performance grade with this tool. Page size, requests, and performance grade will be quite the same in all of the tests.
| Server Location | Test 1 |
|---|---|
| Frankfurt | 2.26 s |
| Amsterdam | 2.24 s |
| London | 1.98 s |
| New York | 1.33 s |
| Dallas | 1.67 s |
| San Francisco | 2.53 s |
| Singapore | 4.17 s |
| Sydney | 3.71 s |
| Tokyo | 3.13 s |
| Bangalore | 3.89 s |
| Global Average | 2.69 s |
Fast or Slow Speed Test
Test 5 is done with Fast or Slow from 18 different worldwide locations. In these results, we measure website interactive time. The Time to Interactive (TTI) metric measures how long it takes a page to become interactive to the site visitor.
| Server Location | Interactive |
|---|---|
| S Africa | 4758 ms |
| Sweden | 3134 ms |
| India | 4911 ms |
| France | 3035 ms |
| England | 1848 ms |
| Ireland | 2781 ms |
| S Korea | 4163 ms |
| Bahrain | 4594 ms |
| Japan | 3620 ms |
| Brazil | 3497 ms |
| Canada | 1443 ms |
| Hong Kong | 4748 ms |
| Singapore | 4710 ms |
| Australia | 4198 ms |
| Germany | 2118 ms |
| USA (VA) | 1447 ms |
| USA (OH) | 2289 ms |
| USA (OR) | 2508 ms |
Uptime
Good Uptime is one of the most required features in any hosting. If your website stays down most of the time, then it is so obvious that your website will lose all of the readers of all of the customers. Most of the hosting claim 99.9% uptime. That means the chances are your website will be down for 43m 49s in a month. Which is average in all of the hosting.
Scala hosting provides a 99.9% uptime guarantee to clients. If they fail to deliver 99.9% uptime, Scala hosting will give you a free credit. So, if your website is up for 99.8%, you will get 10% credit of your plan’s monthly amount. If your website is up for 99.7%, you will get 20% credit of your plan’s monthly amount.
WP Performance Test
These tests are done by WordPress Performance Testing Plugins.
| Server Score | 7.2 |
| Queries Per Second | 628.53 |
| Execution Time (seconds) | 1.591 |
Final Results
- Global Average TTFB: 741 ms
- Global Average Load Time: 2.69 s
Conclusion
Overall, Scalahosting shared hosting is average performing hosting. I do not recommend Scala hosting shared plans to anyone. However, Scalahosting Cloud VPS plans are great. I think A2Hosting, HostArmada, ChemiCloud, or NameHero can be a good choice instead of Sclahosting shared hosting.
HostArmada is an excellent alternative to Scalahosting shared hosting. HostArmada offers high-performing cloud based shared hosting at affordable rates. Read more about HostArmada shared hosting here.
If you like this blog post, please share this article. If you have any suggestions, doubts, or queries, please let me know in the comment section. I will reply to you as soon as possible. If I have made any mistakes, please let me know.
If you want to know more about Hosting Honest Reviews, Extensive Speed tests, Comparisons, and tutorials, then bookmark this website.
