Hello Guys, Welcome to Hosting Lovers!
If you are planning to buy FastComet Shared hosting, and you want to know the performance of FastComet Shared hosting, then you are in the right place. In this blog post, We will test the speed and performance of FastComet Shared hosting with 10+ different and extensive tests.
Let’s Get Started!
FastComet Shared Hosting
FastComet is one of the few privately-owned, independent global web hosting companies nowadays. It was established in 2013. Currently, they host more than 50,000 personal and small-business websites. That is a huge milestone in just 7 years. With 70+ Employees they continue to develop and improve their hosting service every day.
FastComet offers 3 types of hostings currently. Shared Cloud SSD Hosting, Fully Managed SSD Cloud VPS, Fully Managed Dedicated CPU Servers. They also offer domains and FastComet Website Builder along with various types of hostings.
In this blog post, we will only talk about Shared Hostings. So Let’s start without wasting your affordable time.
Plans & Pricing
In the shared hosting segmet, FastComet offers 3 various plans. All plans are fairly priced. You can choose according to your websites and traffic. All plans come with cPanel, Daily Backups, Let’s Encrypt Free SSL, Free Cloudflare CDN, Softaculous 1-Click Autoinstaller, Unlimited Email accounts. In all of the three plans, I think FastCloud Plus is the best value for money plan.
Testing Environment
To test FastComet Shared hosting speed and performance, I bought FastCloud Plus plan. If you are a regular reader of this blog, you will already know that I create the same testing website when I perform speed tests. After buying the plan, I installed WordPress and connected it with my domain which I bought from NameCheap.
I do not want to run tests on a blank website, so I installed Blocksy Theme and one of its demo websites called ‘Floreo.’ I have to install four additional extra plugins with the demo website: Blocksy Companion, WP Forms Lite, Stackable, and WooCommerce.
Hosting: FastComet Shared Hosting
Plan: FastCloud Plus
Server Location: Dallas (TX-US)
WordPress Version: Latest
Themes: Blocksy (Active), Twenty twenty One
Plugins: Blocksy Companion, WP Forms Lite, Stackable, WooCommerce
After setting this testing environment, I did not perform any extra optimizations like caching, Image compressing, modification, or any other kind of speed improvement. It would be best if you always did these optimizations to improve your website, but I wanted to know the actual performance of FastComet shared hosting without any optimizations.
Quick Disclaimer:
I want to inform you guys that all the results are honest and authentic in this blog post. Also, this blog post is not sponsored by FastComet hosting or any other hosting.
To do these kinds of tests, I have to spend a lot of money from my pocket, So I would like to request that if you want to buyFastComet Hosting or any other hosting, please use our affiliate links. You will get an extra discount, and this website will earn a small amount of commission from it. So, we can do more feature speed tests, reviews, and comparisons without any sponsors.
Now, without wasting your precious time, let’s start testing.
TTFB Test
SpeedVitals TTFB Test
| Location | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | 1.1 s | 1.1 s | 1 s |
| America | 854 ms | 914 ms | 793 ms |
| Asia Pacific & Africa | 1.3 s | 1.2 s | 1.2 s |
| Global | 1.1 s | 1.1 s | 1 s |
KeyCDN TTFB Test
With the KeyCDN test, we can measure website total load time and TTFB from 10+ worldwide locations.
| Server Location | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frankfurt | 817 ms | 888 ms | 860 ms |
| Amsterdam | 859 ms | 881 ms | 863 ms |
| London | 820 ms | 809 ms | 842 ms |
| New York | 617 ms | 590 ms | 604 ms |
| Dallas | 516 ms | 458 ms | 505 ms |
| San Francisco | 591 ms | 583 ms | 592 ms |
| Singapore | 1.16 s | 1.08 s | 1.11 s |
| Sydney | 994 ms | 987 ms | 999 ms |
| Tokyo | 871 ms | 843 ms | 873 ms |
| Bangalore | 1.2 s | 1.2 s | 1.2 s |
| Global Average | 844 ms | 831 ms | 844 ms |
Speed Test
SpeedVitals Speed Test
| Metrics | Mobile | Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51% | 75% |
| TTFB | 620ms | 625 ms |
| LCP | 8.5 s | 2.3 s |
KeyCDN Speed Test
| Server Location | Load Time |
|---|---|
| Frankfurt | 2.99 s |
| Amsterdam | 2.65 s |
| London | 3.01 s |
| New York | 1.84 s |
| Dallas | 2.34 s |
| San Francisco | 1.87 s |
| Singapore | 4.06 s |
| Sydney | 4.25 s |
| Tokyo | 3.13 s |
| Bangalore | 4.47 s |
| Global Average | 3.06 s |
Google PageSpeed Test
Google PageSpeed test is the essential test. Google PageSpeed tool is the official tool of Google for measuring website speed and performance. Google PageSpeed test can be different from test to test. Therefore I took three different results from three different days.
Mobile
| Metrics | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 53 | 52 | 52 |
| First Contentful Paint | 6.5 s | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
| Largest Contentful Paint | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
| Speed Index | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
| Time to Interactive | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
Desktop
| Metrics | Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 87 | 87 | 88 |
| First Contentful Paint | 1.3 s | 1.3 s | 1.1 s |
| Time to Interactive | 1.5 s | 1.5 s | 1.3 s |
| Largest Contentful Paint | 1.3 s | 1.3 s | 1.3 s |
| Speed Index | 2.7 s | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
Pingdom Test
In the Pingdom test, we can measure website fully loaded time from 7 worldwide locations.
| Server Location | Load Time |
|---|---|
| Tokyo – Japan | 2.90 s |
| Frankfurt – Germany | 2.49 s |
| London – UK | 2.38 s |
| Washington D.C. – USA | 1.13 s |
| San Francisco – USA | 1.18 s |
| Sydney – Australia | 3.60 s |
| São Paulo – Brazil | 3.03 s |
| Global Average | 2.38 s |
GTMetrix Test
GTMetrix test is based on the Google PageSpeed test. But with the GTMetrix test, we can get results from 7 worldwide locations. Also, with the results, we can get website performance score, TTFB, and fully loaded time.
| Server Location | Performance | TTFB | Fully Loaded Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver, Canada | 85% | 774 ms | 2.4 s |
| Hong Kong, China | 61% | 1.4 s | 4.7 s |
| London, UK | 68% | 821 ms | 4.0 s |
| Mumbai, India | 47% | 1.2 s | 5.3 s |
| San Antonio, TX, USA | 87% | 561 ms | 2.8 s |
| Sydney, Australia | 59% | 996 ms | 4.6 s |
| São Paulo, Brazil | 70% | 974 ms | 4.0 s |
| Global Average | 68% | 960 ms | 3.9 s |
Load Test
With the Load test, we can know how much load any particular website or hosting can handle.
K6 Load Test
| Virtual Users | 50 |
|---|---|
| Requests Made | 5567 reqs |
| P95 Response Time | 6815 ms |
| HTTP Failures | 4383 reqs |
| Peak RPS | 24 reqs/s |
Loader Load Test
| Response Times | 100 Visits/Minute | 250 Visits/Minute |
| Average | 730 ms | 769 ms |
| Minimum | 695 ms | 697 ms |
| Maximum | 1235 ms | 1303 ms |
| Success | 99 | 246 |
Uptime Test
Uptime is one of the most important things in any hosting. Therefore, I measured the uptime of FastComet shared hosting for every one minute.
| Time | Freshping | HetrixTools |
| October, 2021 | Uptime: 99.91% Downtime: 38 mins 56 secs | 99.92% |
| November, 2021 | Uptime: 100% Downtime: 2 mins 7 secs | 99.99% |
| December, 2021 | Uptime: 100% Downtime: 2 mins 9 secs | 99.99% |
| January, 2022 | Uptime: 99.99% Downtime: 3 mins 31 secs | 99.99% |
| February, 2022 | Uptime: 99.99% Downtime: 2 mins 8 secs | 99.99% |
| March, 2022 | Uptime: 99.98% Downtime: 10 mins 19 secs | 99.98% |
| April, 2022 | Uptime: 100% Downtime: 1 mins 30 secs | 100% |
| May, 2022 | Uptime: 99.92% Downtime: 35 mins 53 secs | 99.97% |
| June, 2022 | Uptime: 99.97% Downtime: 11 mins 52 secs | 99.99% |
HetrixTools Overall Uptime: 99.95%
WP Performance Test
The WP Performance test is based on two WordPress plugins, 1) WPPerformanceTester and 2) WordPress Hosting Benchmark tool.
WPPerformanceTester performs the following tests and allows us to see how any hosting server’s performance stacks up against industry benchmark. WordPress Hosting Benchmark tool test the server CPU, memory bandwidth, disk speed, and network download speed. After finishing the test, it provides a server score as a result.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Execution Time (lower is better) | 0.489 s |
| Queries Per Second (higher is better) | 2044.98 |
| Total Time | 10.828 s |
| Server Score | 4.2/10 |
Conclusion
If you like this blog post, please share this article. If you have any suggestions, doubts, or queries, please let me know in the comment section. I will reply to you as soon as possible. If I have made any mistakes, please let me know.
If you want to know more about Hosting Honest Reviews, Extensive Speed tests, Comparisons, and tutorials, then bookmark this website.
